Edition 4

 

TRUTH FINDERS

 

WWW.NOUAW.COM

 
 

   

The Truth Finders are dedicated to distributing the TRUTH to TMMK Team Members so that they may make an informed decision about the UAW.  We are confident that once you learn the facts you will agree that TMMK should remain UNION FREE!

 

The UAW organizers claim that “the UAW is not here for our money, they are here because they were called”.  The truth is the UAW has been here at TMMK since TMMK opened.  The UAW commonly uses “salts” to help organize a plant.  A salt is a person who is paid by a union to obtain a job at a target plant for the purpose of organizing the plant.  The salts work to create problems, distrust and disharmony.   The salt will then try to convince coworkers that the UAW will solve all their “problems”.  The UAW has also admitted to placing salts at TMMI.     www.sbe.csuhayward.edu/~sbesc/column22.html  www.libertyhaven.com/politicsandcurrentevents/unionsandotherorganizations/saltsavor.html      

 

 The UAW organizers claim that laid off workers from other plants could not transfer to TMMK because TMMK would be a “stand alone local”.  Prior to December of 2003, GM workers and Saturn workers were covered under separate contracts but transfers between GM and Saturn were common.  Transfers between GM and Delphi and transfers between Ford and Visteon are also common despite the fact that they are separate companies.  Let’s not forget that the UAW had a side agreement with Daimler Chrysler to give hiring preference to laid off UAW workers when filling job openings at the Mercedes plant expansion.   

www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6287&pf=1        www.autonews.com/news.cms?newsId=7281

www.freep.com/money/autonews/vist27_20040327.htm

 

The UAW organizers claim that control will stay at the local level but if you look at what happened at plants such as Accuride you will see that it is the UAW International that is really running the show.  The UAW International cut off strike benefits to Accuride workers and took over the bargaining talks.  Eventually strike benefits were reinstated.  After months of negotiations the UAW International Executive Board (IEB) put the contract to a vote (it was the same contract that had been voted down 5 times).   The contract contained provisions which would negate seniority, restrict the grievance procedure, outsource all maintenance work and increase insurance premiums.  Furthermore the contract would only allow for less than 25% of the employees to return to work. Employees were told that if they voted it down again that their strike pay and benefits would be cut off again.  The UAW finally revoked the charter of  Local 2036 in Henderson, KY and abandoned the workers at Accuride.  When UAW officials were questioned about why the International Executive Board had cut off benefits to Local 2036 the reply was “You’re not the first local that we have pulled the benefits from, far from the first and you won’t be the last!”

      Perhaps a better way to see who is running the show is to look at where the dues money goes.  If you look at the financial report for a UAW local, you will see that 62% of all dues are sent to the International in the form of a per capita tax.  Some of that tax goes into something the UAW calls a Community Action Program (CAP).  These CAP’s are mostly used to support liberal Democratic candidates.  The biggest UAW CAP in Kentucky reported in 2002 that it had expenses of $79,999 of which $77,785 was for “Other Disbursements” but it doesn’t tell what those other disbursements were.  You’ve got to wonder how union members can figure out what the union is doing with their dues when 97% of the money is unaccounted for.  In 2003 the US Dept of Labor issued new regulations for union financial disclosure statements to give union members a better idea of what was really happening to their dues.  Not surprisingly, the unions opposed these new regulations every step of the way.  Why is it that the unions don’t want their members to know about what is being done with THEIR money?  Perhaps they don’t want you to know that the UAW owns a radio broadcasting network that lost $3 million in 2002 and a golf course that lost $321,000 in 2002.

     To add insult to injury the UAW has worked feverishly to prevent its members from learning their Beck rights.  Your Beck right is your right not to fund the political activities of a union.  In 2001 President Bush issued an executive order which required federal contractors to inform their workers of their Beck rights.  The UAW filed a lawsuit against the Bush Administration in an effort to block this Executive Order.  The UAW has even FIRED members from their jobs for exercising their Beck rights.  Recently a former Colt Manufacturing employee won a judgment against the UAW because of his illegal firing.  HIS CASE HAD BEEN CONSOLIDATED WITH DOZENS OF OTHERS IN A NATIONWIDE CASE AGAINST THE UAW.  Why doesn’t the UAW want its members to know their rights???  What are they trying to hide???   www.nlpc.org/view.asp?action=viewArticle&aid=324 

 http://union-reports.dol.gov/olmsWeb/docs/formspg.html      www.nlpc.org/olap/030714lm.html    www.nrtw.org/b/nr.php3?=283 

  Pittsburgh Tribune-Review June 20, 2001            Washington Times April 23, 2003      www.labornet.org/news/0000/accuridehistory.html  

 

Suggested reading:  Go to www.CCFConline.com and click on “Of Interest”.

The union organizers claim you will have a “voice”.  This is a typical union ploy.  Let’s take a look at how the UAW handles your “voice”.  When a union office is vacated, the Administration Caucus (AC) appoints someone (a handpicked friend of the AC) until an election can be held.  The appointee will then be sent to the Black Lake Golf Course in Michigan for “classes”.   The Election Committee, which is controlled by the AC, will oversee the election and count the votes.  At NUMMI the AC felt that their handpicked candidate would not win, so they scheduled the election for a time that was inconvenient for most people.  Then they made sure all the AC supporters showed up and voted for the handpicked candidate.

Let’s also take a look at how the AC handles resolutions from rank and file members.  Here is a list of some of the resolutions that were presented at one of the UAW’s Conventions: 

·         Proposal to elect union officials instead of appointing them – DEFEATED by the AC

·         Proposal to abolish the collection of dues from profit sharing & lump sum payments – DEFEATED by the AC

·         Proposal to require that changes to the contract be submitted to the members for approval – DEFEATED by the AC

The Delegates at the Convention voted themselves a holiday in Las Vegas at the local union’s expense.  This is in addition to the five days of pay plus expenses that they received.

In August 2003 a group of UAW members called UAW Concern protested outside the AFL-CIO union’s executive board meeting.  Specifically they protested how top UAW officials are elected.  Top UAW officials are elected by delegates at the UAW constitutional convention rather than by direct voting of members.  The delegates have elected every UAW President since 1946.  Tom Marino, an 18 year GM worker, said “You get tired of feeling like they won’t listen to you, like all they really want is your dues money”.  Tom Kelley, a UAW member from Three Rivers, Michigan, stated “Every time we have a contract come up, we lose something.  We want to have our voices heard at the bargaining table.”

     The union organizers claim that you would have a “voice” at the bargaining table.  Let’s look at what their “voice”  achieved during the September 2003 Big 3/UAW contract talks.  They got 50,000 job eliminations, 10+ plant closings, prescription drug co-pays doubled, two tier wages for Delphi, a stricter attendance policy and no raises for the first two years of the contract.  Is this what they sent their Bargaining Committee to achieve???  It doesn’t matter what they were sent for the fact remains that this was the result.    www.uawndm.com/lowlights.htm     www.labournet.net/world/0311/usauto2.html       www.greggshotwell.net/LBA4.php

www.laboutnet.de/branchen/auto/gm-opel/bdog/41.html    http://lists.iww.org/pipermail/iww-news/2003-August/002928.html  

www.labornotes.org/archives/2002/07/c.html       www.labournet.net/world/0311/usauto2.html 

 

The union organizers would like you to believe that the UAW will make all the jobs easy at TMMK.   The truth is that the incident rate at TMMK is below the industry average and it is less than the incident rate at the UAW represented plants of NUMMI, Mitsubishi and Ford-Louisville.  The incident rate at Ford-Louisville exceeds 50%!  In an August 3, 2003 Detroit Free Press letter, a Big 3 employee wrote “The jobs we do are often ergonomically incorrect and repetitive, and this leads to multiple injuries.  In other words, the work we do is extremely physical and often tears our bodies down.  ………Now I suffer chronic shoulder and back pain, and pain in my wrist and hands.”  Also in a recent Detroit Free Press interview, a FORMER Ford employee states “It was a pretty tough job.  I developed carpal tunnel syndrome.  The injury forced me to get a new career.”   (Detroit Free Press   March 4, 2004)

     The Big 3 have process reductions as well.  The big difference is that when they have a process reduction someone losses their job.  A recent article in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch discussed the productivity gains at the Chrysler minivan factory in Fenton, Missouri.  The article reported that “making gains hasn’t been easy or painless.  Because of the rise in productivity and cost cutting, the company has been able to eliminate 900 jobs at the plant during the last three years through departures, retirements and layoffs.  Outsourcing work to suppliers and having employees do more work have been tough issues for the union, Robertson said (Larry Robertson –President of UAW Local 110).  The union wants to protect workers, but it also understands that the plant must stay competitive, he said.  It’s a matter of holding costs down and keeping in business, he said.  You have to deal with what your competitors are doing.”

www.freep.com/money/autonews/drive4_20040304.htm    St Louis Post-Dispatch  March 19, 2004

 

The union organizers are trying to make everyone believe that Toyota laid off workers in Vietnam.  The truth is that the workers were contract workers whose contracts were not renewed and temps who were released.  NO PERMANENT TOYOTA TEAM MEMBERS WERE LAID OFF.   It is also important to note that the Toyota plant in Vietnam is unionized.

 

Comparing our wages to the wages of the Toyota workers in Japan is like comparing apples to oranges due to differences in  pay structure,  exchange rate fluctuations and the higher cost of living in Japan.  But since the UAW organizers have attempted to compare our wages to the wages of the Toyota workers in Japan we will clarify the situation for you.  In March 2003 Toyota and the JAW announced a bonus of 5 months salary plus 550,000 yen.  This amounts to 2,370,000 yen.  In March 2004 Toyota and the JAW announced a bonus of 5 months salary plus 530,000 yen totaling 2,350,000 yen which is 20,000 yen LESS than the 2003 bonus.  In March 2003 the exchange rate was approximately 120 yen per dollar but by March 2004 the exchange rate was approximately 109 yen per dollar.  The UAW organizers used the exchange rate fluctuation to make it appear that the JAW members had gotten a bigger bonus in 2004.  The workers in Japan receive their bonuses in yen not in dollars.  The Toyota/JAW members have only received an increase in their base rate once in the last 3 years.  It is also important to remember that the hourly rate for JAW members is a LOT LESS than what we make at TMMK.  If the UAW organizers like the JAW pay scale then perhaps they should move to Japan and apply for a job at a JAW plant.   If you do try to convert the wages of the JAW to dollars, you will see that their total annual compensation is close to what we make at TMMK but their standard of living is lower than ours due to the high cost of living in Japan.   www.autonews.com/news.cms?newsId=4798    Dow Jones Feb 25, 2004

    

In the last 20 years unions representing workers on private payrolls have LOST 28% of their membership while total employment has grown by 38%.   During that same time period, in inflation adjusted dollars, union members’ pay increased by 4% while the pay of non-union workers increased by 17%.     Source:  UNION MEMBERSHIP EARNINGS and DATA BOOK   2003 Edition

 

We searched for evidence of vehicle giveaways at UAW plants but only found one.  Recently the workers at the Ford plant in Edison, NJ raffled off a Ford Ranger pick-up to raise money for a college scholarship fund for the employees’ children.  They gave away the last truck off the assembly line just before the plant was shutdown PERMANENTLY. 

 

Several team members have mentioned that they signed a card so they have the pleasure of VOTING NO, should there be an election.  They believe that they won’t have to deal with the organizers for another 3-5 years.  This line of thinking is incorrect.  If an election is held another election cannot be held for ONE year.  The UAW can start a new organizing campaign the day after an election.  Go to www.NOuaw.com and learn how to REVOKE your card.

 

A week after the U.S. initiated attacks on the Taliban in Afghanistan, union workers at three plants that produce military vehicles, went on strike at the direction of the UAW leaders.  The strikes were at General Dynamics facilities in Sterling Heights and Lima, OH and Eynon, PA.  Is this how the UAW supports the men and women who risk their lives fighting for our great country???    www.detnews.com/2001/business/0110/16/c02-319644.htm

 

In a recent UAW publication, a UAW Local President urged people NOT to buy Toyotas or Hondas.  Remember that the UAW represents workers at NUMMI that build Toyotas.  The UAW also refused to stand up for one of its members who was FIRED for driving a “foreign” car and not parking in the FAR CORNER of the parking lot.  The far corner of the lot is designated for “foreign” cars.  The UAW considers Toyotas to be foreign even if they are built in the US.  Is this the kind of representation we can expect from the UAW?   www.local600uaw.org/newsletters/UAW600_Nov03.pdf   (page 4)

www.web.ucrc.state.oh.us/abstract/Court/c0000103.htm           www.lsj.com/news/business/030907_cars_1e-6e.html

 

A product designer at DaimlerChrysler filed a complaint with the NLRB against the UAW.  The complaint claims that the UAW failed to inform its members that Chrysler had the right to cut jobs under the terms of the new UAW/Chrysler contract.  The job cut provisions were not disclosed to members before they voted to ratify the contract in 2003.  Dow Jones 3/17/2004

www.detnews.com/2004/autosinsider/0403/17/c01-94484.htm

 

Some team members have requested additional info on the American Automobile Labeling Act.  This website should be helpful:  www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv17n4/reg17n4-cur.html

 

Of interest;  It is expected  that the Hyundai/Kia Group will sell more cars than Honda this year.  Worldwide sales for Hyundai/Kia are expected to be 3.3 million units versus 3.2 million for Honda.   Ten years ago had you ever heard of Hyundai or Kia??

Korea Times 3/4/2004

 

SLOGAN CONTEST UPDATE

We would like to thank those who have submitted slogan ideas.  You can still participate by sending your slogan idea to Truth Finders  PO Box 2005  Georgetown, KY 40324 or by email at TMMKNOUAW@aol.com.  Enter as many times as you would like.  Here are a few of the slogans we have received already:

Sal Davis in IA430 sends this message to fellow team members;  “DON’T HATE ME BECAUSE I AM UNION FREE!”

Rodney Holland in IA260 is always looking out for his fellow team members;   “FRIENDS DON’T LET FRIENDS SIGN CARDS”

Rick Clevinger has some wise words;  UNION FREE, THE ONLY CHOICE WITH A GUARANTEE!”

Rodney Hicks in IA820 wants to share the truth with his fellow team members;  “YOU WANT THE TRUTH, WE’VE GOT THE ANSWERS”    www.NOuaw.com

Duane Power better known as “Country” goes straight to the point;  “MY JOB, MY CHOICE, UNION FREE!”

Aaron Dip a Temp in IA260 sums it up;  “WORK FOR PAY, DON’T PAY TO WORK!”

 

Last year, under pressure from the Big Three, Dana Corp. signed a neutrality agreement with the UAW.  The agreement included union recognition based on card checks.  NLRB supervised elections are NOT allowed under the agreement (Why does the UAW fear secret ballot elections?).  Dana employees at many facilities have successfully fought off the UAW’s attack but the union was certified in a few places.  Union opponents had told their coworkers all along that the union had a sweetheart deal with management and would sell them out just to get their dues.  Recently, Dana employees at the Bristol facility overwhelmingly rejected a contract the UAW was pushing.  The following flier is now being circulated by the Union Free groups at many Dana Corp. facilities.  TMMK Truth Finders is including it here so that Team Members will get a better idea of what might be in store if the UAW gets in at TMMK.

www.nrtw.org/b/nr.php3?id=249     www.nrtw.org/b/nr.php3?id=290   www.nrtw.org/b/nr.php3?id=258    www.nrtw.org/b/nr.php3?id=279

 

 

 

 

 

DANA-BRISTOL CONTRACT SLAMMED DOWN BY

EMPLOYEES

 

Employees overwhelmingly vote NO on new contract and tell

UAW go back to the bargaining table…Or go home!

 

By our reporter

 

As the UAW faces tougher and widespread opposition from organizing future Dana plants, the UAW will

have no bragging rights when they head to other Dana facilities.  The newly formed UAW at Dana-Bristol overwhelmingly voted NO on the new contract.  The results were 130 employees voted No and 3

employees voted YES.  “Workers are furious at what the UAW brought to them.  It was a joke”, says a

Dana worker.

 

“This is an embarrassment”, says a group of pro-union supporters, who claim they’ve made the BIGGEST

mistake of their employment history with Dana.  “We’ve been lied to and used by the UAW”, they say!  “It’s

just like the anti-union people have said all along,  the UAW just wants our dues, and that’s it!  They have

proven that!  We truly believed we were going to help ourselves, and just got slapped in the face by Bob

King himself.  We feel like fools.  What have we done here?  We’ve lost”, they say.  “We never had a voice

Like Bob King claimed we would and we never will have one.  The UAW has created a very bad situation for

the employees in our plant.  The UAW has failed us already and we don’t even have our first contract.”

 

Some union supporters are asking for their cards back and other employees are starting to call their State

Senators to file complaints and get information on how to decertify the UAW and oust them from Dana.

“One of the UAW’s biggest supporter’s was wearing a sign on his shirt that said. ‘No Pension – No

Contract’”, says another Dana worker speaking on condition of anonymity.  “There is a major breakdown

between the union supporters”, she says.  “They are fighting amongst themselves over the contract and

several want their cards back!”  Speculation has it that the newly elected president of their union wants to

step down.  Some of the highlights of the contract include:

 

  • No signing bonus
  • NO Pension increase for the life of the contract
  • 3% raises first 2 years with last 2 years pending plant performance
  • Buzzer to buzzer breaks and lunches with disciplinary action to those who violate it
  • NO MORE smoke breaks
  • Healthworks insurance.  (Another was not even bargained for!)
  • Mandatory overtime
  • Mandatory teams and idea program

 

These are just a few of the highlights.  “We’ve lost all of our perks now”, says one worker.  “I hope the other

Dana plants that are non-union realize what they have and cherish it, because once the UAW comes in, it’s

ALL gone.  ALL OF IT!!! STAY UNION FREE!  If you  haven’t gone union yet, getting you union card back

is the BEST advice I can give my fellow Dana workers at other plants”.  Some workers are questioning how

the UAW and Dana were able to negotiate a contract in a matter of 2 to 3 weeks!  “These are pre-written

contracts”, they say.  “All the UAW is doing is filling in the blanks for each specific plant.  We feel violated in

the worst way by the UAW and Dana.  Shame on Dana for doing this to their workforce”.

 

Some workers knew it was coming after the Dana-Elizabethtown contract was ratified.  Workers there too

Wanted to vote it down but were told by Bob King that it was “the best the UAW could do for them!”  The

Workers of E-town were also told that if they DID vote it down, the next contract would not nearly be as

Good.  Workers are questioning where the employee voice is at that Bob King promised them.  “They

treated us like family when they wanted our card signatures, but as soon as they had the majority and won

their drive, they wanted nothing to do with us except for our dues.”